i have been wrong

Британская пехота на марше

Новый альбом группы Disturbed получит название "Evolution" и выйдет он 19 октября. Первый сингл, песню "Are You Ready" уже можно послушать

Мировозрение рас Варкрафта

Из "Warcraft Heroes Handbook":

...

Альянс:

Humans tend toward no particular alignment. The best and the worst are found among them.

Most dwarves are lawful, believing firmly in the benefits of a well-ordered society. They tend toward good as well, with a strong sense of fair play and a belief that all deserve to share in the benefits of a just order.

Night elves live in close ties with the natural world, they have an unprecedented connection to nature
and protect it fiercely, pulling many night elves towards good. They love freedom and variety, making most lean toward the gentler aspects of chaos as well.

Gnomes are good-hearted, and even the tricksters amongst them are more playful than vicious.
Those of evil alignment are often the result of madness. An innovative idea that consumed them.

Draenei are mostly good. Those who strive towards law are sages, priests, paladins, vindicators, or
scholars. Those who tend toward chaos are warriors, rangers, or in other ways people more fond of pure fighting.

Worgen tend to become chaotic, while originating from humans, the infection of their blood with the wolves has made them more unpredictable.

Most void elves tend to be lawful, much like
their blood elven kin. Those who do become chaotic are
those who lose control of their void powers and become
consumed by them.

...

Орда:

Orcs might not have an innate tendency toward evil, but many end up there. Evil or not, many orcs
lean toward a chaotic alignment.

Forsakens alignment varies, as their race origin, most tend to become more chaotic, and very few keep to good after decades of being an undead.

Most taurenare lawful, keeping to their tribal code. Those who are evil are shunned upon, most either
outlaws or corrupted in some form.

Trolls are a neutral race, their alignment varying drastically between them. Most trolls tend to be
lawful, their tribes often having particular customs and rules for them to abide by.

High elves lies in a very militant society, strict rules have been made for people to uphold, pushing most towards a lawful alignment.

Most goblins tend to be chaotic to a certain degree, even when lawful, they have a spark of chaoticness in them that they cannot get rid off.

Order and structure are key to nightborne. Their society believes that reputation and status are of the
utmost concern, and that mortality and principles of right and wrong are viewed too often in that light. Giving most nightborne a lawful alignment.

...

Независимые расы:

Pandaren are a peaceful race, and for most parts tend to their own, making many pandarens neutral or good aligned. Finding an evil aligned pandaren is unusual.

Был ли Дарвин преимущественно омегой?

Наткнулся на анализ его личностных черт доктором психологии:

"Extraversion: Slightly below average. Darwin was something of an explorer, it’s true. But he was also a bit of a bookworm and he became highly consumed with such non-social tasks as breeding pigeons. He was famously solitary for many years of his life. Like so many of us, Darwin seemed to display a combination of introverted and extraverted behaviors. 

Emotional stability: Slightly below average. Darwin certainly had sufficient levels of emotional stability to allow him to interact effectively with others and to grow a family. However, Darwin was known to have insomnia at times (claiming that the evolutionary puzzle of the peacock’s tail “kept him up at night”). And he famously experienced deep levels of depression for years after the untimely death of his daughter.

 Openness to experience: Considerably above average. It seems that this dimension may serve as a clue as to Darwin’s great success. He was interested in pretty much everything! He was a voracious scholar and prolific writer. Further, he was famously interested in making connections among seemingly disparate phenomena. In his lifetime, he spent extensive amounts of time asking questions about fossils, invertebrates, insects, finches, art, turtles, plant toxins, emotional systems in animals, worms, the inter-relationships among peoples from different parts of the world, the origins of antlers in some animals, the nature of aggressive displays, and on and on. Without question, Charles Darwin was open to experience and eager to understand and learn on just about any topic. 

Agreeableness: Above average. Some people think that Darwin was an out-and-out rabble-rouser. In a sense, obviously, he was just that. He made a point of telling the entire world that they were wrong about where we come from. Yeah, I guess that is pretty bold. But Darwin famously sat on the ideas related to natural selection for decades. He was a church-going man whose family had deep connections within the broader community. He was a conspicuously humble person. And it is well known that he held off on publishing his ideas for decades—largely because he did not want to rock the boat. Personal accounts of Darwin consistently paint him as kind and gentle. I’d argue that this feature of his personality may have been just as instrumental in advancing his ideas as was his high level of openness. You get more bees with honey. Darwin seemed to understand this. 

Conscientiousness: Extremely high. One word that emerges in pretty much all biographies of Darwin is this: “detail.” Darwin was an exceedingly diligent scholar, paying great attention to detail in all of his work and in other areas of his life. Darwin was thorough and methodical across situations. In the parlance of personality psychology, Charles Darwin seemed to have been highly conscientious."

У него была более низкая экстраверсия и более высокая доброжелательность, пока что это наиболее надежные признаки омеги, поэтому Дарвин кажется более омежным, возможно преимущественно омегой.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/darwins-subterranean-world/201808/darwins-personality